As discussed here, the CCD camera became twisted in its thread on the telescope at one point. The problem was fixed, but this means that some of our images have a slight rotation about the frame mid-point. This influences the success of subseqeunt data reduction steps: especially the steps that depend on extracting flux from specific areas on the lunar surface.
We therefore tested for the presence of a rotation angle by correlating a synthetic image made for the observing moment with each and every observed image, rotating the synthetic image until the correlation was maximum – in 1 degree steps.
We plot the detected best rotation angle as a function of image sequence number and date:
Top frame: detected image rotation angle vs sequence number, Bottom panel: angle vs observing day since start.
It certainly seems that almost all images up to number 1800 or so has a rotation angle of some -7 to -8 degrees. That seems to correspond to just a few nights near night 40-50. The detection of rotation is a bit spotty so there are also other episodes where a rotation angle other than 0 is detected – such as images 2000-2500. That more intermittent episode corresponds to a few nights near night 180, but there are a few more examples near night 220.
The CCD twist was correctd by Ben on JD2455991, and this datum is shown as a vertical dashed line in the plot above. Since this is not consistent with the angles measured we have to say that the test so far has been inconclusive!
Added later:
Actually, it was not impossible to inspect the relationship between model images and observed images visually and to confirm when an obvious image rotation was present. Partial results (note: more points than above) look like this:
Here color coding indicates in red the images that so far obviously have a rotation problem, and in blue images that show no obvious problem.
The presence of blue symbols at large rotation angle must be due to failure of the algorithm for detecting rotation! It is not an easy problem to solve – at New Moon there is precious little to correlate images on, unless the DS is used – but the presence of the halo gives problems, so that histogram equalization is not an obvious remedy.
A fixed derotation for the detected nights could be implemented – this affects some of the early observing nights where single images were taken (not stacks).
Added even later:
By manual inspection and image comparison, the following de-rotation angles were found for the JD in the beginning of our sequence:
2455856.1078938 7.711
2455857.0817247 6.881
2455858.0931277 6.881
2455859.1269613 0.000
2455864.7037639 5.352
2455865.7157216 6.116
2455886.0356274 0.000
2455905.9722493 0.000
2455912.0991783 0.000
2455917.1285750 0.000
2455923.7124300 0.000
2455924.7257543 0.000
Apart from 2455859 all angles before 2455886 were clear to find. 2455859 was hard to inspect as it is very near New Moon and almost no features were detectable.
As a working hypothesis, let us assume that all images before 2455886 must be rotated by something like 6 or 7 degrees, to bring them into good alignment with their synthetic models.
